Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Los delitos de odio se multiplican por seis en Salamanca por racismo y orientación sexual

La Gaceta de Salamanca · published on August 23, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la discriminación. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones. Una expresión aparece citada o denunciada y no cuenta.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
August 23, 2026
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en lagacetadesalamanca.es PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

La Gaceta de Salamanca lagacetadesalamanca.es

By Ángel Benito ·

abc Quoted or analyzed (does not count) abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

Los delitos de hatred se multiplican por seis en Salamanca por racismo y sexual orientation

… una red social para contar su historia. Eran altas horas de la madrugada cuando varios chicos se dirigieron a un joven salmantino, lo golpearon mientras le gritaban «faggot (slang)» y le estrellaron la cabeza contra una farola hasta abrirle la ceja. Denunció los hechos ante la Policía Nacional, pero al día siguiente dio marcha atrás por «miedo a represalias» . Su historia no es un caso aislado. En junio, la Universidad de Salamanca acogió el Congreso Internacional contra la discriminación y los delitos de hatred en el que participaron expertos de todo el país. El fiscal especializado, Miguel Ángel Aguilar, advertía de que los casos que salían a la luz eran la mínima parte ya que existía un elevado nivel de «infradenuncia» y «miedo» de víctimas «rechazadas y humilladas por ser diferentes».Salamanca cerró 2025 con un repunte muy acusado de los delitos e incidentes de hatred. El Ministerio del Interior contabilizó 12 hechos conocidos en la provincia, frente a los dos registrados en 2024 , lo que supone multiplicar por seis la cifra en …

… la comparación.El racismo y la xenofobia concentraron la mitad de los hechos registrados en 2025 , con 6 casos, mientras que otros 4 estuvieron relacionados con la sexual orientation or the gender identity . The informe recoge además un caso de antisemitismo y otro incidente en el resto de categorías. El cambio no está solo en el número total, sino también en una mayor diversidad …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 98

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra la identidad de género, nombra la orientación sexual, nombra la discriminación. Solo da voz a las autoridades: no recoge a la familia, a amistades ni a organizaciones. Una expresión aparece citada o denunciada y no cuenta.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 4 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+8
  3. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  4. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−7
  5. Rating98

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 time
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What the article quotes, denounces or attributes to other people

These expressions appear in textual quotations, as terms that the text examines or in words of other people that the note reports or points out as an offense. Naming them to report or denounce them is not using them, so they do not count in the rating.

  • Términos despectivos · como término que se denuncia …varios chicos se dirigieron a un joven salmantino, lo golpearon mientras le gritaban «faggot (slang)» y le estrellaron la cabeza contra una farola hasta abrirle la ceja. Denunció los…

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names discrimination
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · Crímenes de odio y transfeminicidios

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-C37M-P59M

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 10:20:06 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-C37M-P59M Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 10:20:06 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 11, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 18:10 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy ae7b25e53ac07b14539bffc4acd6a831d18209809afba87057f8671b9eb7366e

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Ángel Benito
Published
August 23, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Fuera de México

It is foreign press: we keep it for the statistics on LGBTTTIQANB+ people, but it is not a Memoria y Resistencia case.

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 324 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.