Skip to content
Pasa un enlace a Turing

Analysis of the article

El Congreso de Jalisco rechaza reconocer a las infancias trans

Grupo Milenio · published on January 28, 2026

The most important

¿Qué pasó?

Mala noticia para nuestros derechos

It reports the stance against our rights of a person who holds public office.

Ver dónde lo dice

Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.

¿Cómo lo contó el medio?

Very good

The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.

El 98 es por cómo lo escribió, no porque sea buena noticia.

¿Qué puedo hacer?

Ver la nota marcada Leer en milenio.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

Guardamos una prueba de que existió tal como la leímos · Reference number CC-FSH8-G9N2

On this page
  1. The most important
  2. La nota marcada
  3. Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
  4. ¿Es cierto lo que dice?
  5. Who speaks 1
  6. See a mistake?
  7. Para saber más

La nota marcada

Los párrafos donde encontramos algo

The amber strip with es lo que va contra nuestros derechos. Lo demás subrayado es la forma de nombrar. Toca una marca para ver por qué. No copiamos la nota completa.

Grupo Milenio milenio.com

By Gloria Reza ·

abc Goes against our rights abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

El Congreso de Jalisco rechaza reconocer a childhoods trans

Con 22 votos en contra, 11 a favor y una abstención, el Congreso de Jalisco desechó la sentencia de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación que determinó inconstitucional la restricción de edad para el cambio de gender identity en la entidad.Las bancadas de MC, PAN, PRI, y un diputado del PT y dos del Verde Ecologista, votaron en contra, mientras que la de Morena, Hagamos, Futuro y el …

… las diputadas que más debatió a favor de la orden de la SCJN fue la morenista, Candelaria Ochoa quien habló de las consecuencias de no acatar la sentencia.“Yo le informé a la corte cuando se votó en la comisión, con tres votos a favor y dos en contra le informé a la Corte esa situación, y por supuesto también, la Junta de Coordinación Política (Jucopo), bueno sobre todo la mesa directiva le tuvo que informar diciendo así …

… a nombre de la bancada de MC, se subió a debatir sobre el tema, y esto comentó del porqué de su decisión, dejando claro que buscan salvaguardar los derechos de las niñas y niños jaliscienses. “Votamos un dictamen, que es una sentencia, por parte de la Suprema Corte de Justicia que lo que busca es legalizar la emisión de una nueva acta de nacimiento de los menores de edad, bajo una identidad para quienes se reconozcan con otra gender identity, es decir childhoods trans, esto es un mal llamado permiso estatal, que para que las niñas, niños, y adolescentes accedan a cambios de identidad legal, nosotros hemos emitido un voto en bloque, todas las y los diputadas de Movimiento Ciudadano para salvaguardar los derechos de nuestras niñas y niños jaliscienses, nosotros creemos que este dictamen tiene falta de legalidad, pero sobre todo de sentido común y que se extralimita, y que verdaderamente no cuida y no acompaña a nuestra niñez jalisciense, esta sentencia lo que marca es que lo puedan hacer sin el consentimiento de sus padres, …

Qué cambiar y qué hace bien

What it does well

Cómo se calculó el 98 está en Para saber más.

Very good

  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 3 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 98 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+6
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−10
  6. Rating98

Turing related it to what the site already knows

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 time
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Gives context with data
  • Uses the Supreme Court’s criteria

¿Es cierto lo que dice?

¿Es cierto lo que dice la nota?

Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Quién habla en la nota

Las personas con cargo público y las otras voces que aparecen, y si están a favor o en contra de nuestros derechos.

Legislators quoted

What they said counts in their Legislative Observatory evaluation. Each position passed a verification: the quote is in the article, it belongs to this person and a second AI review agrees.

Talk about this initiative

See a mistake?

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Un dato está mal

Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.

Avisar de un dato

Soy del medio

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Para saber más

Cómo se calculó el 98Lo que resta y lo que suma, la versión de Turing y si ayudó una IA

Se ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».

The proofCopia guardada con folio CC-FSH8-G9N2, su certificado y su valor legal

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-FSH8-G9N2

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 12:00:05 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-FSH8-G9N2 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 12:00:05 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 12, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 18:54 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 53fd63212596969defaa1914009cd65d93da49550deb96f33cd43e37054b0d45

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

En el Observatorio LegislativoLa iniciativa y las personas legisladoras que Turing relacionó con la nota

Legislative observatory

As this note speaks of an initiative and legislators, we automatically record it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Gender identity of transgender children and adolescents · Recognition of gender identity

  • Bill · Jalisco

    Acuerdo para pedir prórroga a la SCJN sobre infancias trans

    The AI found that the note speaks to this initiative. The note already appears on your page.

    See the bill

  • Diputación local de Jalisco · Morena

    María Candelaria Ochoa Ávalos In favor

    “Con 22 votos en contra, 11 a favor y una abstención, el Congreso de Jalisco desechó la sentencia de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación que determinó inconstitucional la restricción de edad para el cambio de…”

    Unconfirmed: it is visible on their record, but it does not count in their evaluation until it is confirmed by their official account, an official source or another independent outlet.

    See their record See the bill

  • Diputación local de Jalisco · Hagamos

    Valeria Guadalupe Ávila Gutiérrez No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Jalisco · Morena

    Emmanuel Alejandro Puerto Covarrubias No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Jalisco · Morena

    Martín Franco Cuevas No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Jalisco · Verde

    Alberto Alfaro García No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Jalisco · Verde

    Yussara Elizabeth Canales González No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

Other voices in the article

  • Parliamentary group

    Bancada de Movimiento Ciudadano en el Congreso de Jalisco Against Negative connotations

    “hemos emitido un voto en bloque, todas las y los diputadas de Movimiento Ciudadano para salvaguardar los derechos de nuestras niñas y niños jaliscienses, nosotros creemos que este dictamen tiene falta de legalidad, pero…”

    Shown on the bill’s page. It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

    See the bill

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Note detailsMedio, fechas y versiones guardadas

Data

Byline
Gloria Reza
Published
January 28, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 98Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 481 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.