Punto MX punto.mx
By Fernanda Magallanes ·
abc Generic masculine
Los diputados de Mazatlán y las comisiones que presiden en el Congreso
MAZATLÁN. – Los diputados locales en el Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa ya fueron asignados a …
The whole site
Analysis of the article
Punto MX · published on October 10, 2024
¿Qué pasó?
Bad news for the community
It reports a murder.
Lo dice Turing al leer la nota.
¿Cómo lo contó el medio?
The article uses respectful language. It mostly uses the generic masculine.
El 97 es por cómo lo escribió, no porque sea buena noticia.
What Can I Do?
We keep proof that it existed as we read it · Reference number CC-9MJN-AEU2
Análisis preliminar: Turing aún no termina de revisar esta nota y la completará solo en cuanto pueda.
La nota, en resumen
Lo resume Turing con su análisis de la nota. No copiamos la nota: abajo van solo las frases que lo explican y el enlace para leerla completa en Punto MX.
Nada que corregir en su forma de nombrar.
Citas breves de la nota de Punto MX, para explicar el análisis. Toca una marca para ver por qué.
Punto MX punto.mx
By Fernanda Magallanes ·
abc Generic masculine
Los diputados de Mazatlán y las comisiones que presiden en el Congreso
MAZATLÁN. – Los diputados locales en el Congreso del Estado de Sinaloa ya fueron asignados a …
¿Quieres leer la nota completa? Está en la página de Punto MX. Así también apoyas al medio que la publicó.
Leer en punto.mx (opens in a new tab)Qué cambiar y qué hace bien
Cómo se calculó el 97 está en Find out more.
Very good
The article uses respectful language. It mostly uses the generic masculine.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2024 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v3.0 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Turing related it to what the site already knows
¿Es cierto lo que dice?
Turing compara las cifras, leyes y casos que menciona con lo que tenemos documentado. No decimos «falso»: si algo no cuadra, te enseñamos la evidencia.
Turing está comparando lo que afirma la nota con el Memorial, la sección Congresos y gobiernos y verificaciones publicadas…
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
Una persona, una fecha, una cifra o una postura que no corresponde. Escríbenos y lo revisamos.
Avisar de un datoIf you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewSe ve en «Qué cambiar y qué hace bien».
The proof
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-9MJN-AEU2
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 13, 2026, 23:10:32 (Central Mexico time)
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
d015fc07b899a07502bfb2be3c39e5ff06653c7dc27d511fab005c9e3a0a0d31
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
La nota habla del trabajo de un congreso, pero no encontramos en ella a ninguna persona del directorio ni una iniciativa de la sección Congresos y gobiernos. Si sabes de qué iniciativa habla, elígela abajo.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.