Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Investigan asesinato de persona transexual

planoinformativo.com · published on May 13, 2023

The essentials

Very good writing

Backed up and certified CC-8EX7-58JM

The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.

Published
May 13, 2023
Analyzed
November 7, 2026
State
Online
Leer en planoinformativo.com PDF

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

What Turing analyzed

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

How it was rated

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2023 (lo indicaste tú)

Analyzed with Turing v2.3 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Google Gemini

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender Mild · 1 pointing · subtraction 3
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 97 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Name and gender−3
  3. Gender and rights perspective+4
  4. Only gives voice to the authorities−3
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−1
  6. Rating97

This article is a source for a case in the record. We check whether it names Shakira with their name and gender, as stated in the record. The legal name is never shown.

Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 vez
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizationsNo
  • ExpertsNo

It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.

What is worth changing

  1. Name and gender · review … · Los elementos investigadores establecieron la identidad de la víctima, a door de 37 años con identidad de género femenina. · Asimismo, la instancia de procuración… See it in the text Check whether it refers to the victim in the masculine. If she was a trans woman or travesti, use the feminine.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. The article

    «La Fiscalía General del Estado de San Luis Potosí investiga el homicidio de una persona encontrada sin vida a la orilla de la carretera Tamuín-Ciudad Valles.»

    Unconfirmed

    Only this article says it, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-B87GAE · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

In the Memorial

This article is connected to stories we have already documented.

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-8EX7-58JM

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 7, 2026, 11:21:28 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-8EX7-58JM Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 7, 2026, 11:21:28 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy cfdbf3a89a6fdf91734ffda779a0d239a515d52a3cbf70a2029d595fb9a0ab2a

The text was pasted or uploaded by a person. On its own it does not prove it was online; that is what the Internet Archive copies are for.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
DE LA ROSA VELAZCO PAOLA
Published
May 13, 2023
Last analyzed
November 7, 2026
Turing
2.3 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.