Skip to content
Report a sham

Dependencia u organismo público

Eneyda Rocha Ruíz

Partido sin registrar

Cargo actual Presidenta del Sistema Estatal del DIF · Sinaloa

Their stance in the Observatory

Not enough evidence

Turing registró un dicho, pero le falta la confirmación de una fuente oficial o de dos medios independientes, o la copia certificada. Hasta tenerla, no lo marca

Turing is following this case Held a post devoted to sexual and gender diversity

It checks their candidacy, whether they registered through an affirmative action and whether they keep what they promise the community. See what it follows.

See what they said

What they have said and done

  • 1 in favor

2022 1 statement

  1. News article In favor Speaks respectfully

    Sobre respeto a la diversidad sexual

    El Universal eluniversal.com.mx

    Comunidad LGBTIQ+ llena las calles de Sinaloa de color en marcha del orgullo gay

    «Previo al corte del listón, la presidenta del sistema estatal de Desarrollo Integral de la Familia dijo que se debe inculcar en todas las personas el respeto a la diversidad, vivir en armonía, bajo la libertad de decisión de cada una de las personas.»

    • Como Presidenta del Sistema Estatal del DIF
    • Unconfirmed: only one outlet so far

    Where it was published

    1. El Universal

      Comunidad LGBTIQ+ llena las calles de Sinaloa de color en marcha del orgullo gay

      Turing’s analysis Certified copy CC-SCR2-ZJN7 Verified

Each card is one statement. On top is the most faithful quote (from their official account or verbatim), and below are all the articles that published it, from first to last. If several outlets tell it in other words, it is still the same statement and counts once.

“Unconfirmed” means that so far we have found it in only one outlet. It counts as confirmed when an official source (their own account or a government website) or a second independent outlet publishes it, even in other words. If two outlets copy the same text, it counts as one.

This is what they said or did according to the cited post, not a verdict on the person. Turing only publishes a statement if the quote is in the post and a second AI review from another company agrees it belongs to this person; if they disagree, a third one decides. The team can correct any statement.

Are you this person or part of their team? Send us your clarification.

¿Cómo se registra y qué cuenta?

Turing lee cada nota que analiza. Si encuentra a esta persona diciendo o haciendo algo sobre los derechos LGBTTTIQANB+, guarda la cita tal cual, la verifica con una segunda IA de otra empresa y guarda una copia certificada de la publicación (con huella digital y sello de tiempo de un tercero), para que quede la prueba aunque la borren.

Solo se da por confirmado lo que publica una fuente oficial (su propia cuenta o un sitio de gobierno) o dos medios independientes; lo demás se muestra como «Sin confirmar». La misma cita en varios medios cuenta una vez.

El sello sale solo de dichos confirmados y con copia certificada de la publicación: «Persona no aliada» si se pronunció o actuó en contra; «Simula apoyo» si dice apoyar los derechos LGBTTTIQANB+ pero también se pronunció o actuó en contra; «Persona aliada» si se pronunció a favor y no tiene nada en contra registrado. Si la evidencia no alcanza, dice «Sin evidencia suficiente»: Turing no adivina.

Promises and candidacy

  • Held a post devoted to sexual and gender diversity

We don’t yet have any sourced promises they made to the community. Turing looks for them every few days.

Why is Turing following this person?

Turing follows anyone who holds, held or seeks public office when an article links them to the LGBTTTIQANB+ community: a post devoted to diversity, a campaign, an affirmative action or promises to the community. It checks their candidacy and whether they keep what they promise. A promise is only called unkept with an official source or two independent outlets. Following someone is not accusing them of anything.