Congreso del Estado de Yucatán
LXIV Legislatura (2024–2027)
Official website (opens in another tab) Transparency 50/100 · Low
Congress of the Union
State congresses
Seguimos cada iniciativa, punto de acuerdo y posicionamiento sobre los derechos de las personas LGBTTTIQANB+ en la LXIV Legislatura del Congreso del Estado de Yucatán: quién lo presentó, a qué comisión llegó y cuánto tiempo lleva esperando un dictamen.
Records last updated: October 17, 2026
Each instrument with the time it has been in Congress. The 45 and 90 business days marks indicate when a bill starts to lag and when we consider it in the freezer. How we calculate it.
Showing 3 of 3 instrumentos que coinciden con tu búsqueda.
In the freezer Bill · presented on March 18, 2026
Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el que se modifica el Código de la Administración Pública de Yucatán y la Ley de Gobierno de los Municipios del Estado de Yucatán, en materia de…
166 business days without a committee report
In process Bill
Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el que se reforma el artículo 2 de la Constitución Política del Estado de Yucatán, en materia de protección y reconocimiento de los derechos de la…
In process
In process Bill
Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto que reforma la Constitución Política del Estado de Yucatán y el Código de Familia para el Estado de Yucatán, en materia de identidad de género
In process
Presenting is not the same as achieving. An approved reform changes the law; an exhortation only asks. That is why we separate each type of instrument and evaluate results, not just quantity. We count only what this observatory follows, not all of Congress’s activity.
7 - on f-up 4 aprobados · 1 in the freezer
They propose creating or changing a law, a code or the Constitution. If they are passed and published, they bind every authority. It’s the instrument with the greatest reach and the hardest to push through: it needs a committee report and a vote of the Plenary.
0 - on f-up 0 aprobados
They ask an authority to do something or set out a position of the Congress. They don’t change any law or bind anyone legally: their force is political. They tend to pass more easily, sometimes the same day.
0 being tracked
Statements from the floor or in the media. They put a position on record, but they aren’t voted on and have no legal effect.
Legislative work or simulation? Presenting many exhortations and position statements without a single bill, or presenting bills and leaving them in the freezer, gives visibility but does not change rights. Pushing a bill forward is also the responsibility of whoever presents it: lobbying the committee, asking for a report and securing the votes. That is why we mark these signs in the evaluation.
Presenting a proposal is easy; getting it approved takes work: convincing the committee, asking for it to be reviewed and securing the votes.
This is how it is ranked: 1) more laws passed; 2) if tied, more achievement points (each proposal adds its weight according to its outcome: an approved new law or constitutional amendment is worth 3, an approved amendment 2, an approved exhortation 1; those that move forward add a part); 3) if they are still tied, the better rating. The rating (from 0 to 100) measures effectiveness: how well what they submitted fared, on average.
1 of 2 bills approved
1 ley aprobada · 3,1 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new laws1 of 2 bills approved
1 ley aprobada · 3,1 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new lawsSubmitting is not enough: you also have to lobby the committee and get the votes. Here are those who have proposals that passed the legal deadline without review and none approved, and those who submitted proposals that look like a sham. Letting something freeze is not the same as being against: that is why they are in yellow, except for shams, which are flagged separately. Whoever fakes support does not appear among the best-rated people. Number 1 is the one with the most frozen proposals. 1 persona en total, 1 con todas sus propuestas congeladas.
See the full methodology, with examples and academic sources
1. Not all proposals are worth the same. An amendment to the Constitution or a new law weighs 3; an amendment to a law or code, 2; an exhortation or point of agreement, 1; and a position statement, 0.5. It is an adaptation of the Multidimensional Index of Significance (Bárcena, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2019), which distinguishes high-impact proposals from symbolic ones.
2. What happened to each one matters. Approved adds 100; reviewed by the committee, 60; on time, 35; delayed, 15; rejected, 5; and frozen, 0. The rating is the average, giving each proposal the weight of its significance. Position statements are not voted on, so they are not included in the rating.
3. Colors. Green: achieves results. Blue: their proposals move forward. Yellow: submitted, but their proposals are frozen or stalled (a lack of push, not necessarily bad faith). Red: submitted or backed proposals against of LGBTTTIQANB+ rights. Gray: stayed silent, without submitting or backing anything.
4. Allies who drive and allies who support. Submitting a proposal is worth twice as much as signing it in support. Those who submit bills champion the agenda; those who only sign, submit exhortations or take a position support it.
70 or more: effective · 45 to 69: moving forward · 25 to 44: waiting · less than 25: submitted, no progress. We only count proposals on LGBTTTIQANB+ rights followed by this observatory, not all their legislative work. We measure progress in Congress; whether a law is then fulfilled in people’s lives requires an impact evaluation ex post like the one proposed by Transparencia Mexicana (2023).
First those who got their bills approved; then, by rating. Only instruments the person presented count (not sign-ons). “Approved” means the Plenary voted for it by majority or it has already been published.
| Person | Bills | Approved for them | Reports | Stalled | Exhortations | Stat. | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clara Paola Rosales Montiel Morena | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 100/100 · Efectiva |
| Itzel Falla Uribe PAN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 100/100 · Efectiva |
| Alba Cristina Cob Cortés Morena | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 61/100 · Avanza |
| Gaspar Armando Quintal Parra PRI | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | 61/100 · Avanza |
| Francisco Rosas Villavicencio PT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | |
| Harry Gerardo Rodríguez Botello Fierro Verde | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | |
| Rosana de Jesús Couoh Chán No party | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) | 0 | |
| Manuela de Jesús Cocom Bolio PAN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 |
Instruments in which the person appears as author or co-author.
Alba Cristina Cob Cortés Morena
2 instruments introduced
2 instruments introduced
Clara Paola Rosales Montiel Morena
1 instrument introduced
1 instrument introduced
1 instrument introduced
1 instrument introduced
1 instrument introduced
Rosana de Jesús Couoh Chán No party
1 instrument introduced
Sign-ons: legislators who signed in support of an instrument presented by someone else.
No sign-ons recorded.
Each instrument counts once for each party of its authors and once for each party that signed on. The same instrument can add to several parties.
Who has put their name in favor of our rights in this congress, and who against.
Drives: introduced bills in favor. Supports: submitted exhortations or position statements, or spoke out in favor publicly. Signed without speaking out: signed in support, but did not submit anything or speak out in favor publicly; signing or voting is not enough to be an ally. Not an ally: submitted or backed at least one proposal against, or spoke out against publicly. Fakes support: signed or submitted in favor, but speaks out against publicly. Silence: in office, without introducing or backing any proposal on these rights.
Ranked by points: each proposal in favor adds its weight (3, 2, 1 or 0.5 depending on its scope) and is worth half if they only signed it in support.
Alba Cristina Cob Cortés Drives
Presentó 2 iniciativas de ley · 5 pts
Gaspar Armando Quintal Parra Drives
Presentó 2 iniciativas de ley · 5 pts
Francisco Rosas Villavicencio Drives
Presentó 1 iniciativa de ley · 3 pts
Harry Gerardo Rodríguez Botello Fierro Drives
Presentó 1 iniciativa de ley · 3 pts
Rosana de Jesús Couoh Chán Drives
Presentó 1 iniciativa de ley · 3 pts
Clara Paola Rosales Montiel Drives
Presentó 1 iniciativa de ley · 2 pts
Itzel Falla Uribe Drives
Presentó 1 iniciativa de ley · 2 pts
Manuela de Jesús Cocom Bolio Drives
Presentó 1 iniciativa de ley · 2 pts
We have not recorded proposals against rights in what we track.
They neither submitted nor signed in support of any proposal, not even on difficult issues. Silence is also a position.
“No party”: deputies with no party or parliamentary group, or with no party in the official document. Independent candidacies are counted separately. Tap a party to see its profile.
We only count proposals on LGBTTTIQANB+ rights followed by this observatory and the support signatures recorded on them; Plenary votes are not included.
Contamos los días hábiles (de lunes a viernes) desde que un instrumento se presenta hasta que la comisión lo dictamina. Señalamos rezago a los 45 y congeladora a los 90.
Legal basis: Reglamento de la Ley de Gobierno del Poder Legislativo del Estado de Yucatán, art. 74: las comisiones tienen un plazo de 45 días hábiles para emitir su resolución, contados a partir del día siguiente a que la iniciativa se distribuya de manera oficial en sesión de comisión; la Presidencia de la Comisión puede pedir al Congreso una prórroga hasta por un término igual (45 días hábiles más). El mismo artículo da hasta 60 días hábiles para distribuir las iniciativas a las y los integrantes desde que la comisión las recibe. El art. 62 suspende el plazo mientras se resuelve una declinatoria de competencia. El art. 34, fracc. VIII, de la Ley de Gobierno obliga a la Mesa Directiva a turnar en un plazo de 15 días hábiles. Se consultó la versión del Reglamento con última reforma publicada en el Diario Oficial el 22-09-2026. See the law (opens in another tab)
Current text consulted: latest reform published on September 22, 2026.
We record each piece of data from the Gazette and Congress’s official documents. If you find an error, write to us. How much does each congress publish? See the transparency index.
The plenary approved it or it was already published.
The committee has already issued its report; the Plenary still has to vote or the process has to conclude.
It has 45 business days or less since it was introduced and hasn’t been reported on yet.
More than 90 business days without a committee report: it is stalled.
The process ended without approval.
Find out who sits on each committee, what bills they have pending and how to contact them.
