Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Instituto Electoral y de Participación Ciudadana del Estado de Guerrero Consejera Presidenta

iepcgro.mx · published on September 9, 2025

The essentials

Very good writing

Backed up and certified CC-MSGE-WFYQ

La nota culpa o estigmatiza a la víctima.

Published
September 9, 2025
Analyzed
November 6, 2026
State
Online
Leer en iepcgro.mx PDF

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

What Turing analyzed

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs of the article where we found something, without reproducing it in full. Each underline style is a type of finding; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis below. Hover over or tap a mark to see why we flagged it.

abc Blames the victim abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

… 5.9 Atención a solicitudes de Medidas de Seguridad presentadas por Candidaturas ....................................................................... 5.10 Record de Coaliciones ..................................................................... 5.11 Record de Candidaturas Comunes ........................................ 5.12 Record de Plataformas Electorales ....................................... 5.13 Record de Candidaturas ................................................................. 5.13.1 Record de Candidaturas a Diputaciones por los

5.15 Affirmative action ........................................................................... 5.15.1 Record de Candidaturas de Personas de la Diversidad Sexual .............................................................................................................. 5.15.2 Record de Candidaturas de Personas con Discapacidad ..................................................................................................................... 5.15.3 Record de Candidaturas de Personas Indígenas ..

Durante el periodo de contratación se realizó 1 sustitución de SEL y 32 de CAEL. Los pagos realizados a las y los SEL y CAEL fueron de acuerdo a la siguiente tabla: CAE SEL HONORARIO S GASTOS DE CAMPO HONORARIOS GASTOS DE CAMPO TIPO DE VIDA1 IMPORTE MENSUAL RANGO

TIPO DE VIDA1 IMPORTE MENSUAL RANGO

Para el registro de candidaturas del PEO 2023-2024, se estableció como parte de los requisitos que deberían cumplir todas the people candidatas, no estar inscrita en el Padrón de Deudores Alimentarios Morosos , registro que en la entidad está a cargo de la Coordinación Técnica del Sistema Estatal del Record Civil del Estado de Guerrero; por ello, con fecha 23 de febrero de 2024, el IEPC Guerrero suscribió un Convenio de colaboración institucional con el Poder Judicial del Estado de Guerrero y la Secretaría General de Gobierno del Estado de Guerrero por conducto de la Coordinación Técnica del Sistema Estatal del Record Civil del Estado de Guerrero , a fin de establecer las acciones necesarias para garantizar el intercambio de información que sirviera al IEPC Guerrero, para verificar que la ciudadanía postulada por los Partidos Políticos, coaliciones y candidaturas comunes, a un cargo de elección popular, no se encontraran inscritas en el Record Estatal de Deudores Alimentarios Morosos.

Esta acción tuvo como precedente que en el marco del PEO 2023-2024, el 8 de septiembre de 2023, el IEPC Guerrero, las Dirigencias de los Partidos Políticos con registro nacional y local que participaron en el PEO 2023-2024, suscribieron el Pacto Estatal por los Derechos Políticos y Electorales de las Mujeres Guerrerenses Libre de Violencia en el PEO 2023-2024, de igual manera, se sumaron a dicha firma atestiguando honoríficamente el Poder Ejecutivo, el Poder Legislativo, el Poder Judicial, la Comisión Estatal de Derechos Humanos, el Tribunal Electoral del Estado de Guerrero, la Fiscalía Especializada en Delitos Electorales, la Coordinación Técnica del Sistema Estatal del Record Civil del Estado de Guerrero y Organizaciones Civiles integrantes permanentes del Observatory de Participación Política de las Mujeres Guerrerenses, en el que los Partidos Políticos asumieron los siguientes compromisos:

Como resultado de la reforma de 2020 sobre VPMRG, el IEPC Guerrero implementó el Sistema Estatal de Record de Personas Sancionadas en materia de VPMRG, el cual entró en vigor a partir del Proceso Electoral Concurrente 2020-2021, dicho registro se encuentra previsto en el artículo 128 del Reglamento de Quejas y Denuncias en Materia de VPMRG, a través de un Sistema Informático el cual contiene una lista pública de todas the people que han sido sancionadas por ejercer este tipo de violencia, con el que se busca inhibir este tipo de conductas; así como facilitar la cooperación entre instituciones para la generación de información y consultar la información previo al registro de candidaturas. De los PES sustanciados en materia de VPMRG en el PEO 2023-2024 por la CCE de la Se - cretaría Ejecutiva y que fueron remitidos al TEE para su resolución, se desprende que en dos procedimientos y como sanción 2 personas fueron inscritas en el Sistema Estatal de Record de Personas Sancionadas en Materia de VPMRG, así como también en el Record Nacional del INE. Dicho sistema es público y puede consultarse a través del siguiente link: https://www.iepcgro.mx/principal/Sancionadas

En razón de disminuir las desigualdades a las que se enfrentan the people - sexual diversity, se cuenta con diversas herramientas para seguir impulsando la inclusión de the people of community development. para facilitar el acceso a los derechos político-electorales. Como resultado de la inclusión de la Comunidad LGBTTTIQ+ en la vida democrática de nuestro estado en el PEO 2023-2024, resultaron electas 33 personas que se identifican con community development., 16 de ellas propietarias y 17 suplentes distribuidas de la siguiente forma:

The full analysis

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Blames the victim
  • Inclusive language

La nota culpa o estigmatiza a la víctima.

Context pieceGives data, background or analysis. Strong expressions that it only describes or attributes to the press do not count.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.1 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 12
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 17 strengths
Inclusive language 95%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 94 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Blames the victim−12
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−9
  6. Rating94

Turing la relacionó con lo que ya sabe el sitio

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities9 veces
  • Family, friends and neighbors1 vez
  • Collectives and organizations4 times
  • ExpertsNo

What is worth changing

  1. Culpa a la víctima · 2 veces …a la siguiente tabla: CAE SEL HONORARIO S GASTOS DE CAMPO HONORARIOS GASTOS DE CAMPO TIPO DE VIDA IMPORTE MENSUAL RANGO · $3,201.00 · TIPO DE VIDA IMPORTE MENSUAL RANGO · $4,512.00 · CARA… See it in the text Orientation and identity aren’t a “lifestyle”. If relevant, name them.

What it does well

  • Names gender identity
  • Names sexual orientation
  • Names non-binary people
  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gender perspective
  • Mentions action protocols
  • Mentions the specialized prosecutor’s office
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Respects the presumption of innocence
  • Gives context with data
  • Offers a contact for help or institutions
  • Gives useful information about HIV
  • Talks about affirmative action
  • Respects self-identification
  • Demands due diligence

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Legislative observatory

The legislators, bills and other voices we found in the article.

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

Topic: Acciones afirmativas y representación política · Salud integral, VIH y atención trans

  • Senaduría de la República · Morena

    J. Félix Salgado Macedonio No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Guerrero · Morena

    Jacinto González Varona No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Guerrero · Morena

    Ma. Guadalupe Eguiluz Bautista No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Guerrero · Movimiento Ciudadano

    Erika Lorena Lührs Cortés No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Guerrero · Morena

    Pablo Amilcar Sandoval Ballesteros No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-MSGE-WFYQ

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 6, 2026, 17:49:05 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-MSGE-WFYQ Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 6, 2026, 17:49:05 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 42e134e0c4b5e7b54d2f7bab1f68b96c6b7aa5ebf8d09a74d677083f0112c87c

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

About the note

Data

Published
September 9, 2025
Last analyzed
November 6, 2026
Turing
2.1 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 94Version 1 · November 6, 2026 · 53,322 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.