Skip to content

Post analysis

Post by @politicomx

@politicomx · X · published on May 30, 2023

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

Para responder hay que iniciar sesión: así tus correcciones quedan en tu seguimiento.

Correct Turing's analysis
Published
May 30, 2023
Analyzed
November 8, 2026
State
Online
Leer en x.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la publicación completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

Político MX @politicomx

abc Goes against our rights abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Luego de que @armentapuebla_ se pronunció en contra de las infancias y adolescencias trans, la diputada le recomendó ser candidato del @AccionNacional a la gubernatura de Puebla, porque “es el único partido donde esas declaraciones tienen cabida”.

[0:00] Quiero hacer un llamado muy enérgico al senador para decirle que las Trans people no somos una moda y que las infancias trans tampoco son una moda. Cada persona trans que él dice ser su amiga, fue un infante trans al igual que yo y al igual que muchas personas que hoy viven su infancia y que están previos a comenzar su adolescencia …

… viven desinformación, infantes a las que nada le abona escucharlo en la televisión, rechazarle su identidad y rechazarle su derecho a vivir una infancia trans. Lo que sí es una moda, senador Armenta, es querer ser gobernador de Puebla y si usted da estas declaraciones conservadoras para quedar bien con grupos conservadores de su estado, pues entonces yo le recomendaría que mejor buscará ser candidato a gobernador de Puebla por el PAN, porque el Partido Acción Nacional es el único partido donde esas declaraciones tienen cabida.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the post listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2023 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.6 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 1 strength
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+2
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Calificación (entre 0 y 100, con redondeo y topes por categoría)100

What it does well

  • Uses “trans woman”, “trans man” or “trans person”

What it claims

What the post says, fact-checked

Al analizar la publicación, Turing revisa las cifras, leyes y casos que afirma y lo que dicen las organizaciones, personas legisladoras y autoridades que cita, y los compara con el Memorial, el Observatorio Legislativo y verificaciones publicadas.

  1. The article

    «Alejandro Armenta se pronunció en contra de las infancias y adolescencias trans.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  2. Maria Clemente Legislator For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Las personas trans y las infancias trans no son una moda.»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-324PB5 · PDF · Turing compara con lo que tenemos documentado (un conteo mínimo). No decimos «falso»: si no coincide, te enseñamos la evidencia. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Who appears in the post

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in itor in its context any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Identidad de género de las infancias y adolescencias trans · Reconocimiento de la identidad de género

To understand the context, the AI also read:

  • La conversación de X a la que responde (empieza @manuellara746)

    --- Después de la publicación analizada, en el mismo hilo --- [@manuellara746 · NICE · 2023-05-30] https://x.com/DrRespeto/status/1663392958027272192?t=W_X8yzeSetMhMQEi7AvHfQ&s=19 EL [@CEstruendo · Comisionado del estruendo · 2023-05-30] La conducta de ese humano es reprobable. No puede representar sino el lado más miserable de la sociedad. [@Geraltderivi4 ·  The Witcher  · 2023-05-30] Este sr es un degenerado y debería estar en la cárcel [@KAANEC · KAAN EK · 2023-05-30] Permíteme, te explico [@ArmandoCLeonide · Armando Daniel · 2023-05-30] Lamentable que esta "persona" ocupe un puesto para el que no esta preparada, ni académicamente ni profesionalmente. [@unciudadano79 · Un ciudadano más · 2023-05-30] No, no es una moda, es una enfermedad. [@Apolyan1 · Apolyan · 2023-05-30] Tiene trabada la quijada, vayan haciéndole una prueba antidrogas. [@lizy_cordova · 🤷🏻‍♀️ · 2023-05-30] eres un hombre con muchas frustraciones y traumas.

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this post existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-9DYP-4X8Z

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 8, 2026, 12:11:29 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-9DYP-4X8Z Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read (text, account, date and images) and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 8, 2026, 12:11:29 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copia en Ghostarchive En fila para Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

En fila para Ghostarchive

Turing la guarda en Ghostarchive, un archivo público e independiente que sí acepta X. Va de una en una, para no saturarlo, y lo que tiene dichos va primero; el enlace aparece aquí en cuanto quede guardada. Mientras, la copia ya es válida con su huella digital y sus sellos de tiempo.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy d3c9f2e533b0457c771d373223211d24f7ac35bab3397fcb610c1b8ddfbc7e3f

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

Por eso cada copia usa estándares abiertos que cualquiera puede comprobar sin confiar en nosotros: huella SHA-256, sello de tiempo RFC 3161 de un tercero, OpenTimestamps sobre Bitcoin y la copia independiente de Ghostarchive.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

Sobre la publicación

Data

Published
May 30, 2023
Last analyzed
November 8, 2026
Turing
2.6 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 8, 2026 · 231 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.