The whole site
How is it written?
The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
The text
These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.
El Universal eluniversal.com.mx
By Writing ·
abc What it does well
Se reconoció abiertamente como mujer transexual y acomoañó al activismo por la sexual diversity. En 2014 impulsó en la Asamblea Legislativa la rectificación de las actas de nacimiento para personas transgénero.
The rating
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
Very good
The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2021 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed
Second opinion with AI from Claude de Anthropic
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Turing related it to what the site already knows
It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.
What it claims
In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.
Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...
Who speaks
The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.
Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.
Topic: Legal gender recognition
Diputación local de Ciudad de México · Asociación Parlamentaria Mujeres por el Comercio Feminista e Incluyente
Diana Sánchez Barrios No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
Senaduría de la República · PRI
Alejandro Moreno Cárdenas No position
The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.
What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error
The proof
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-ARAH-NSTV
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 9, 2026, 06:20:11 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Backed up on archive.org
Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 9, 2026, 12:25 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
aa3133f78b41c516ce161e05c6f866dccbdf7b77e7b81b3052bf57f23122d2e9
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Record
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewThe analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.