Skip to content

Analysis of the article

Nombran a Omar Lizárraga comisionado de la Diversidad Sexual en Sinaloa

Cafe Negro Portal · published on October 31, 2022

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa expresiones agresivas o de odio. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis
Published
October 31, 2022
Analyzed
November 9, 2026
State
Online
Leer en cafenegroportal.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la nota completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

Cafe Negro Portal cafenegroportal.com

abc Goes against our rights abc Hostile speech abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Nombran a Omar Lizárraga comisionado de la Diversidad Sexual en Sinaloa

Culiacán, Sinaloa (Café Negro Portal).- “Aquí se viene a trabajar; no se viene a simular, vamos a hacer un gran equipo”, dijo Omar Lizárraga al asumir el cargo de comisionado de la Diversidad Sexual en Sinaloa.

En presencia de la dirigente de Morena, Merary Villegas Sánchez, y de la secretaria de la Diversidad Sexual del Comité Ejecutivo Nacional, Almendra Negrete, Lizárraga se comprometió a trabajar a favor de community development. LGBTTT+ e inyectar sus 15 años de experiencia como activist para dar resultados positivos.

Lizárraga manifestó que trabajará de manera coordinada con todos los municipios a favor de community development. de la diversidad para lograr el desarrollo y que el proyecto siga creciendo.

Manifestó que el hecho de que en la entidad no se cree aún una Secretaría de la Diversidad no debe ser impedimento para que se cumpla la agenda LGBTTT1+ al ser Morena un partido que promueve los procedures.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 93

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Aggressive language
  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language

La nota usa expresiones agresivas o de odio. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2022 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Claude de Anthropic

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech Leve · 1 señalamiento · resta 14
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 100%

How to read this rating

  • Why is the rating high? What the article does well, such as naming the person’s identity, giving context or echoing the demand for justice, offsets part of what takes points off. It never erases it: an article with flags does not reach 100.
How we arrived at 93 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Hostile speech−14
  3. Gender and rights perspective+10
  4. Inclusive language+5
  5. What it does well offsets only part of what it loses−8
  6. Rating93

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What is worth changing

  1. Hostile speech …cree aún una Secretaría de la Diversidad no debe ser impedimento para que se cumpla la agenda LGBTTT+ al ser Morena un partido que promueve los derechos humanos. · La también diputada… See it in the text It presents the rights of LGBTTTIQANB+ people as a conspiracy.

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers the person with a dignified photo

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

Since this article talks about of legislators, we automatically recorded it in the Legislative Observatory. Here is the result; you can check it whenever you want.

  • Diputación federal · Morena

    Merary Villegas Sánchez No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

  • Diputación local de Sinaloa · Morena

    Almendra Ernestina Negrete Sánchez No position

    The article mentions them, but does not attribute to them a position of their own on the topic.

    See their record

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-U6VJ-PUBU

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 9, 2026, 06:20:08 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-U6VJ-PUBU Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 9, 2026, 06:20:08 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy to Ghostarchive In line for Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 9, 2026. We check it from time to time.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

In line for Ghostarchive

Turing keeps it in Ghostarchive, a public and independent archive. It goes one at a time, so as not to saturate it, and what has sayings goes first; the link appears here as soon as it is saved. Meanwhile, the copy is already valid with your fingerprint and time stamps.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 0c46149d1dfb5866b8d96bf73ec60cccdaf8df7a57cbcd0039269f7ba8110b8f

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That's why every copy uses open standards that anyone can check without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin, and Ghostarchive's standalone copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Published
October 31, 2022
Last analyzed
November 9, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 93Version 1 · November 9, 2026 · 259 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.