Skip to content
Turing

Analysis of the article

Señalan a Betuky Camacho por "boicot" a Marcha del Orgullo en Puebla

Intolerancia Diario · published on May 15, 2025

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

With community corrections under review. Una persona corrigió la lectura de esta noticia y el cambio ya se ve aquí. Turing lo está revisando: si se confirma, se queda y lo aprende; si no, vuelve a como estaba.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
May 15, 2025
Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en intoleranciadiario.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Intolerancia Diario intoleranciadiario.com

Señalan a Betuky Camacho por "boicot" a Marcha del Orgullo en Puebla

By Jorge Castillo ·

abc Generic masculine abc What it does well «…» Direct quote

La Asociación para la Protección de la Pluralidad Sexual y Derechos Humanos (APPS) acusó públicamente al funcionario estatal "Betuky" Camacho de boicotear la marcha del orgullo LGBTTTIQ+.

Alberto “Betuky” Camacho Arroyo, director de Diversidad Sexual del gobierno estatal, fue acusado de intentar frenar e intervenir de manera indebida en la organización de la Marcha del Orgullo LGBTTTIQ+, programada para el próximo sábado 21 de junio a las 15:00 horas en la capital poblana.

En conferencia de prensa, María José “Majo” Flores Serrano, presidenta de APPS y activist reconocida por la defensa de los derechos LGBT, denunció que el funcionario ha buscado imponer decisiones en la organización del evento, sin consultar a los colectivos que desde hace años han encabezado la movilización ciudadana.

Flores agregó el titular de la Dirección de Diversidad Sexual pretende realizar una marcha paralela a la convocada por el Collective APPS.

Los integrantes de APPS denunciaron que Camacho Arroyo está promoviendo una supuesta marcha alterna desde correos electrónicos enviados en nombre de un tercero, sin transparencia ni consenso con las organizaciones históricas del movimiento.

“Somos buenas personas, somos también personas que están por los procedures, pero no somos fotos. Nos damos cuenta quién está detrás”, dijo una de las voceras al exhibir imágenes del funcionario en eventos institucionales.

Asimismo, el collective denunció que Camacho Arroyo ha hecho comentarios despectivos sobre integrantes de la propia comunidad LGBT, contradiciendo el perfil que debería mantener un funcionario encargado de velar por la inclusión y los procedures.

También hicieron un llamado a los colectivos de la sexual diversity a mantenerse unidos y alertas ante cualquier intento de manipulación política.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: habla de diversidad sexual, nombra a la población lgbtttiqanb+, enfoque de derechos humanos.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

Second opinion with AI from Google Gemini

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 0%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Who does it listen to?

  • Authorities1 time
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations3 times
  • ExpertsNo

What it does well

  • Talks about sexual diversity
  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Human rights approach
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Remembers the person with a dignified photo

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

  1. Asociación para la Protección de la Pluralidad Sexual y Derechos Humanos (APPS) Organization Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «APPS acusó a Betuky Camacho de boicotear la marcha del orgullo LGBTTTIQ+ en Puebla»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  2. Asociación para la Protección de la Pluralidad Sexual y Derechos Humanos (APPS) Organization Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «APPS afirma que en el currículum de Camacho Arroyo aparecen títulos universitarios sin cédula profesional»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  3. Asociación para la Protección de la Pluralidad Sexual y Derechos Humanos (APPS) Organization Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «APPS denuncia que Camacho Arroyo pretende realizar una marcha paralela a la convocada por el Colectivo APPS»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  4. Asociación para la Protección de la Pluralidad Sexual y Derechos Humanos (APPS) Organization Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «APPS pidió al gobierno de Alejandro Armenta un deslinde público de las acciones del funcionario Betuky Camacho»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  5. Asociación para la Protección de la Pluralidad Sexual y Derechos Humanos (APPS) Organization Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «APPS solicitó una investigación formal sobre las credenciales académicas de Camacho Arroyo para ocupar cargos públicos en la administración estatal»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-ST8VCG · PDF · Turing compares to what we have documented (a minimum count). We don't say “false” - if it doesn't match, we show you the evidence. See a mistake?

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-9HTX-Q7CB

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 08:10:14 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-9HTX-Q7CB Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 08:10:14 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Being saved on archive.org

Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy cba5c7705df5aae3699bbec8b17066693cc4feae23df8a17f9f19916396b21e5

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

About the note

Data

Byline
Jorge Castillo
Published
May 15, 2025
Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 10, 2026 · 415 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.