Skip to content
Turing

Post analysis

Post by @ContrastesdePue

@ContrastesdePue · X · published on June 13, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
June 13, 2026
Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en x.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la publicación completa. La franja ámbar con señala lo que va contra nuestros derechos. The other underlines are wording details; the number takes you to its explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we flagged it.

Contrastes de Puebla @ContrastesdePue

abc Goes against our rights abc What it does well abc Inclusive language

📢 María José Flores Serrano, presidenta del Collective #APPS #DerechosHumanos, pide la destitución de Betuky Camacho de la Dirección de Diversidad de la @Segob_Puebla. Argumenta la politización del movimiento lgbt con marcha organizada por #Morena.

… una marcha en donde el año pasado coronaron a un funcionario, que es Betuki Camacho, que es una marcha que en donde subió al diputado Jaime López Vela. Nosotros como collective hemos cuidado que sea ciudadana todos estos 10 años, pero esta otra marcha lamentablemente se ha quedado de rodillas ante las autoridades. Por eso hacemos un llamado no tan solamente a las autoridades de que destituyan a este funcionario que está haciendo que community development. of LGBT pierda su marcha, está orillando a community development. of LGBT a radicalizarse, porque si nosotros no conseguimos las cosas por las buenas, tendremos que hacerlos por las manos. Entonces, como comunidad LGBT estamos muy molestos con esta autoridad que nos vino a imponer a Betuki a una persona sin activismo previo y que todo su trabajo ha sido estar haciendo quedar bien con el poder. Y pues bueno, llamamos tanto a community development. que se abstenga a participar en la marcha de Morena, en la marcha de LGBT de Morena, porque hay que decirlo con todas sus letras, esa marcha es de Morena. Van a haber muchísimos funcionarios, van a estar ahí Mayte Rivera Vivanco, la …

Así se ve en X

La muestra X tal como está hoy, con sus videos e imágenes. Si la borran o la cambian, aquí queda lo que Turing leyó y su copia certificada.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the post listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language 100%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+4
  3. Inclusive language+5
  4. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Turing related it to what the site already knows

What it does well

  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists

What it claims

What the post says, fact-checked

Al analizar la publicación, Turing revisa las cifras, leyes y casos que afirma y lo que dicen las organizaciones, personas legisladoras y autoridades que cita, y los compara con el Memorial, el Observatorio Legislativo y verificaciones publicadas.

  1. The article

    «El diputado Jaime López Vela participó en la marcha organizada por el partido Morena en Puebla»

    Unconfirmed

    Only this article says it, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.

    See the evidence

  2. The article

    «La regidora Mayte Rivera Vivanco asistirá a la marcha organizada por el partido Morena en Puebla»

    Unconfirmed

    Only this article says it, and we didn’t find it in our records or in any other source. Until an official source or two independent media outlets confirm it, it remains unconfirmed.

    See the evidence

  3. María José Flores Serrano Legislator Against LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Betuky Camacho ocupa el cargo de Director de Diversidad de la Secretaría de Gobierno del Estado de Puebla»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  4. The article

    «El año pasado Betuky Camacho fue nombrado funcionario en la Dirección de Diversidad de la Secretaría de Gobierno del Estado de Puebla»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  5. The article

    «La marcha organizada por el partido Morena se está llevando a cabo en el Parque Recreativo, al lado de las oficinas estatales de Morena»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-Q49ZN8 · PDF · Turing compares to what we have documented (a minimum count). We don't say “false” - if it doesn't match, we show you the evidence. See a mistake?

Who speaks

Who appears in the post

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress. It does not name any legislator from the directory, but it does name other voices that take or avoid taking a position; they are below.

Other voices in the article

  • Party leadership

    Colectivo #APPS #DerechosHumanos In favor Speaks respectfully

    “María José Flores Serrano, presidenta del Colectivo #APPS #DerechosHumanos, pide la destitución de Betuky Camacho”

    It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

  • Otra voz · Director de Diversidad de la SEGOB Puebla

    Betuki Camacho Against Negative connotations

    “destitución de Betuky Camacho de la Dirección de Diversidad de la @Segob_Puebla”

    It neither adds nor takes off points: only legislators have a rating.

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this post existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-CJDQ-TSFR

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 08:13:56 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-CJDQ-TSFR Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read (text, account, date and images) and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 08:13:56 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy to Ghostarchive In line for Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

In line for Ghostarchive

Turing la guarda en Ghostarchive, un archivo público e independiente que sí acepta X. Va de una en una, para no saturarlo, y lo que tiene dichos va primero; el enlace aparece aquí en cuanto quede guardada. Mientras, la copia ya es válida con su huella digital y sus sellos de tiempo.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy a61310be1b658e2116ee80eea0950483ce2ee231237f5ff1d75e39f4df657488

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That's why every copy uses open standards that anyone can check without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin, and Ghostarchive's standalone copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

Sobre la publicación

Data

Published
June 13, 2026
Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 10, 2026 · 318 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.