Skip to content
Turing

Post analysis

Post by @e_consulta

@e_consulta · X · published on June 10, 2025

How is it written?

Very good writing

The article uses respectful language.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

Yes, it's correct No, I want to correct it

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
June 10, 2025
Analyzed
November 10, 2026
State
Online
Leer en x.com PDF
Share

Share this analysis

X Facebook Threads WhatsApp

The text

Where we found it

Estos son los párrafos donde encontramos algo, sin reproducir la publicación completa. Los demás subrayados son detalles de redacción; el número lleva a su explicación en el análisis. Toca o pasa el mouse sobre una marca para ver por qué la señalamos.

Periódico e-consulta @e_consulta

abc What it does well

#AlMomento 🏳️‍🌈 Betuki Camacho, titular de la Dirección de Diversidad, aclara los señalamientos que lo acusan de querer boicotear la Marcha LGBTIQ +, convocada por el Collective APPS; sin embargo, admite que no fue invitado a participar. Respecto a su currículum, compartió que se encuentra terminando una carrera en Derecho.

[0:00] entonces la las puertas abiertas pues son abiertas para todos. Eh el collective ABS me no me hizo la invitación para eh para marchar con ellos. El otro collective que es un mil y un gramos más ya me extendió la invitación, vamos a estar marchando con ellos el próximo sábado y en cuanto al tema de currículum, eh yo estudié filosofía, estudié en el seminario Palafoxiano y ahorita estoy concluyendo mis estudios en derecho, entonces todo está

Así se ve en X

La muestra X tal como está hoy, con sus videos e imágenes. Si la borran o la cambian, aquí queda lo que Turing leyó y su copia certificada.

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the post listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • Respectful

The article uses respectful language.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2025 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 2 strengths
Inclusive language Not applicable
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+4
  3. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

What it does well

  • Names the LGBTTTIQANB+ population
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists

What it claims

What the post says, fact-checked

Al analizar la publicación, Turing revisa las cifras, leyes y casos que afirma y lo que dicen las organizaciones, personas legisladoras y autoridades que cita, y los compara con el Memorial, el Observatorio Legislativo y verificaciones publicadas.

  1. Betuki Camacho Person quoted For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Betuki Camacho afirma que el Colectivo APPS no le hizo la invitación para marchar con ellos»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  2. Betuki Camacho Person quoted For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Betuki Camacho indica que el colectivo "mil y un gramos más" le extendió una invitación para marchar el próximo sábado»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

  3. Betuki Camacho Person quoted For LGBTTTIQANB+ rights

    «Betuki Camacho declara que está concluyendo sus estudios en Derecho»

    We don’t have enough data

    It isn’t a figure, a law, a statement or a case we can compare with our records.

    See the evidence

Report VR-2026-5S25W3 · PDF · Turing compares to what we have documented (a minimum count). We don't say “false” - if it doesn't match, we show you the evidence. See a mistake?

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this post existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-UF7Z-DA98

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 10, 2026, 08:15:52 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-UF7Z-DA98 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint We saved what Turing read (text, account, date and images) and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 10, 2026, 08:15:52 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy to Ghostarchive In line for Ghostarchive.
  5. 5. Monitoring It was still online on November 10, 2026. We check it from time to time.

GHOSTARCHIVE · ghostarchive.org

In line for Ghostarchive

Turing la guarda en Ghostarchive, un archivo público e independiente que sí acepta X. Va de una en una, para no saturarlo, y lo que tiene dichos va primero; el enlace aparece aquí en cuanto quede guardada. Mientras, la copia ya es válida con su huella digital y sus sellos de tiempo.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy 6b7fc2be16b0600f3ddf109349e9428c79a88f479c8976d4cbb27317f9590c9e

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

See the certificate Download as PDF Check another folio
What is it worth as evidence?

It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).

That's why every copy uses open standards that anyone can check without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin, and Ghostarchive's standalone copy.

It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.

Record

Sobre la publicación

Data

Published
June 10, 2025
Last analyzed
November 10, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 10, 2026 · 135 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.