Skip to content

Analysis of the article

EZLN | PREGUNTAS

Radio Zapatista · published on November 10, 2026

How is it written?

Very good writing

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el feminicidio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la discriminación.

In the cross-cutting issues

Turing reads it apart from the grade: the grade measures how it is written; this shows what counts in each topic. See all issues.

Is this analysis correct?

Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.

To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.

Correct Turing's analysis

Published
November 10, 2026
Analyzed
November 11, 2026
State
Online
Leer en radiozapatista.org PDF
Share

Share this analysis

The text

Where we found it

These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.

Radio Zapatista radiozapatista.org

EZLN | PREGUNTAS

abc What it does well abc Inclusive language «…» Direct quote

Desde el día 3 de octubre, en horas de la tarde, personas cercanas a la glorieta de los desaparecidos, anunciaron en sus redes sociales que estaba confirmado un encuentro, el 6 de diciembre, de groups de familiares y el EZLN en la Glorieta de las y los Desaparecidos, mientras la Comisión Sexta mantenía una reunión con enviados de la Sexta Nacional, y a la que asistieron, sin invitación, varias buscadoras.

Días después, alguien y a nombre de las familias buscadoras de “La Glorieta de las y los Desaparecidos”, circuló en sus redes una “invitación”. Por varios medios se les hizo saber que no era el conducto. Que mandaran la invitación vía el Frayba, quien nos apoyaba y apoya en todo lo referente a record y propuestas de familias, grupos y colectivas de buscadoras.

Insistimos mandándoles mensajes de que rehicieran la invitación por lo mismo. Mientras, seguía creciendo la confusión, y colectivas y grupos empezaban a cambiar sus fechas para estar presentes en “LA” reunión. Les advertimos que nos estaban orillando a un desmentido público. Esto es, a una respuesta severa para aclarar.

Hasta donde entendemos, el espacio de La Glorieta de las y los Desaparecidos no es una organización, sino un espacio de encuentro. Esto es, no tienen una vocería ni dirección establecida. Es un lugar donde suelen converger grupos y colectivas de familias buscadoras. Supusimos que tienen o tenían un mecanismo para hacer acuerdos y tomar decisiones. Y que, por lo tanto, someterían a ese mecanismo la pertinencia o no de esa redacción que, lo sabían con antelación, provocaba molestia en los zapatistas.

Miren, hay grupos feministas que conocen todo lo relacionado con feminicidios. Otros con infanticidios. Otros con trata de personas. Otros con crímenes impunes. Otros en homophobia. Otros en racismo y segregación. Y así con cada uno de los horrores que se padecen en esta geografía llamada México.

Ni homofobia. Así sea usted otroa (lesbiana, homosexual, transexual y todos los nombres con los que identifica la diferencia sexual), no sólo puede dar clases a infantes heterosexuales (si se capacita antes, claro), ser milicianoa, ocupar cargos en las comunidades y en la organización, y llamarse como le dé la gana y tener la gender identity que le plazca.

Ok, nos dicen, es que en la Glorieta no saben qué es el zapatismo. Los grupos, groups y redes de familias buscadoras no tienen por qué conocer o saber qué o quién es el EZLN. Sí, es ignorancia, pero no mala fe.

… celos: que sí es que queremos quitarles el protagonismo a ciertos personajes siniestros, o a grandes, medianas o pequeñas agrupaciones de familias que buscan o de groups y colectivas; que si queremos sacar algo (como con torpeza sostiene el MPJD que no quiere sino reforzar la plataforma del partido “Somos México” -que basa toda su estrategia en …

The rating

How Turing arrived at 100

What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.

Very good

  • With a gender perspective
  • Inclusive language
  • Respectful

La nota usa un lenguaje respetuoso. Tiene perspectiva de género y de derechos: nombra el feminicidio, nombra la identidad de género, nombra la discriminación.

News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.

Text by 2026 Date of publication

Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed

AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.

What takes points off

The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.

Derogatory terms No flags
Name and gender No flags
Blames the victim No flags
Sensationalism No flags
Hostile speech No flags
Imprecise terms No flags

What adds points

What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.

Gender and rights perspective 5 strengths
Inclusive language 83%
How we arrived at 100 out of 100
  1. Every article starts with100
  2. Gender and rights perspective+10
  3. Inclusive language+3
  4. Rating (between 0 and 100, with rounding and caps by category)100

Who does it listen to?

  • AuthoritiesNo
  • Family, friends and neighborsNo
  • Collectives and organizations1 time
  • ExpertsNo

What it does well

  • Names femicide
  • Names gender identity
  • Names discrimination
  • Gives a voice to collectives and activists
  • Gives context with data

What it claims

What the article says, fact-checked

In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.

Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...

Who speaks

Who appears in the article

The public officials, bills and other voices we found, and what Turing did with what they say.

Legislative observatory

The article is about the work of a congress, but we did not find in it any person from the directory or a bill from the Observatory. If you know which bill it is about, choose it below.

Topic: Reconocimiento de la identidad de género · No discriminación por orientación o identidad

What each person said is published on their record only if it passes a verification: the quote is in the article, it is that person, and a second AI review agrees. Whatever does not pass is decided by a third AI review, without waiting for the team, which can correct any position. Report an error

The proof

Certified copy

Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.

Record of existence on the internet

Reference number CC-XPJF-HWF4

Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 04:20:19 (Central Mexico time)

Código QR del certificado CC-XPJF-HWF4 Scan to verify
  1. 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
  2. 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 04:20:19 (Central Mexico time).
  3. 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
  4. 4. Copy at Internet Archive (done) Saved on November 11, 2026 on servers that are not ours. See the copy on the Internet Archive (opens in another tab)
  5. 5. Monitoring (done) It was still online on November 11, 2026. We check it from time to time.

INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine

Backed up on archive.org

Internet Archive, an independent digital library, saved its own copy on its servers on November 11, 2026, 10:45 (UTC). We check its index to confirm it exists before showing it here.

Why does this make it authentic?
  • It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
  • The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
  • Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
  • It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
  • Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.

Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.

SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy eb3408a01b7828b3b0a64b501088bfceeed1c851df791416142bddb64ab7aacc

Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.

Record

About the note

Data

Published
November 10, 2026
Last analyzed
November 11, 2026
Turing
2.8 (the current one)
State
Online
Place of the events
Mexico

Saved versions

  • 100Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 2,887 words

Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.

Are you from the outlet?

If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.

Request a review

Keep exploring

Preparing your PDF… We are putting together the analysis with the underlined text and the QR code.

Made by and for the community

This tool is free because someone donated before you

We receive no government funding. Your donation helps us keep reviewing how the press names LGBTTTIQANB+ people and keep the memory of each case alive.

Donate $100 once

Secure payment with Stripe through Nodo Cívico, the organization behind Memoria y Resistencia.

See all options

The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.