Revista Códigos revistacodigos.com
Murió Marcos Camino, histórico fundador y acordeonista de Los Palmeras
By horacio ·
abc What it does well
Allanaron la casa de Icardi en Nordelta tras una denuncia de Wanda Nara por presuntas lesiones a su ...
Analysis of the article
Murió Marcos Camino, histórico fundador y acordeonista de Los Palmeras
Revista Códigos · published on November 10, 2026
How is it written?
96out of 100
Very good writing
The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.
- No expressions to change
- 1 thing it does well
Is this analysis correct?
Your answer trains Turing and improves the rating.
To answer, you have to Sign-in: so your corrections remain in your follow-up.
- Outlet
- Revista Códigos
- Published
- November 10, 2026
- Analyzed
- November 11, 2026
- State
- Online
The text
Where we found it
These are the paragraphs where we find something, without reproducing the entire note. The other underlines are drafting details; the number leads to their explanation in the analysis. Tap or hover over a mark to see why we pointed at it.
The rating
How Turing arrived at 96
What deducts from and adds to the rating, whom the article listens to, what is worth changing and what it does well.
96out of 100
Very good
- Respectful
The article uses respectful language. Only gives voice to the authorities: it does not include family, friends or organizations.
News articleReports facts. We check that it tells them with respect and without morbidity.
Text by 2026 Date of publication
Analyzed with Turing v2.8 · What changed
AI was not involved in this article: it was rated only by Turing’s rules.
- Google Gemini: no need
- OpenAI GPT-OSS in Groq: no need
- Claude from Anthropic: no need
What takes points off
The bar grows with the weight of each problem in the rating. Empty means no flags.
Derogatory terms
No flags
Name and gender
No flags
Blames the victim
No flags
Sensationalism
No flags
Hostile speech
No flags
Imprecise terms
No flags
What adds points
What the article does well. It offsets part of what takes points off, never all of it.
Gender and rights perspective
1 strength
Inclusive language
Not applicable
How we arrived at 96 out of 100
- Every article starts with100
- Gender and rights perspective+2
- Talks about suicide and does not say where to seek help−3
- Only gives voice to the authorities−3
- Rating96
Who does it listen to?
- Authorities2 times
- Family, friends and neighborsNo
- Collectives and organizationsNo
- ExpertsNo
It only gives a voice to the authorities: the official version stands as the only one. It is worth seeking out the family, collectives or experts.
What it does well
- Respects the presumption of innocence
What it claims
What the article says, fact-checked
In analyzing the memo, Turing reviews the figures, laws, and cases he claims and what the organizations, legislators, and authorities he cites say, and compares them to Memorial, Legislative Observatory, and published verifications.
Turing is comparing what the note states with the Memorial, the Legislative Observatory and published verifications...
The proof
Certified copy
Proof that this article existed exactly as Turing read it, even if it is later changed or deleted.
Record of existence on the internet
Reference number CC-VDRQ-JCZ8
Valid and verifiable Sealed on November 11, 2026, 04:24:29 (Central Mexico time)
Scan to verify
- 1. Copy and digital fingerprint (done) We saved what Turing read and took its SHA-256 fingerprint.
- 2. RFC 3161 timestamp (done) An independent third party (FreeTSA) signed the fingerprint on November 11, 2026, 04:24:29 (Central Mexico time).
- 3. Anchored in Bitcoin (done) The fingerprint is in the OpenTimestamps calendars; it will be in a Bitcoin block within a few hours.
- 4. Copy at Internet Archive (in progress) It is being saved; the link appears once we confirm it exists.
- 5. Monitoring (in progress) We check it from time to time to know if it gets deleted.
INTERNET ARCHIVE · Wayback Machine
Being saved on archive.org
Turing has already sent it. The link to the copy appears here as soon as we confirm in the archive.org index that it really exists (it may take a few hours).
Why does this make it authentic?
- It is an independent witness. Internet Archive is a non-profit digital library that has preserved the web since 1996. It has no ties to Memoria y Resistencia or to whoever published the content.
- The copy is theirs, not ours. Their own system captures it, stores it on their servers and stamps it with their own date and time. Neither we nor the publisher can edit it or change its date.
- Anyone can verify it. It is at a public web.archive.org address that contains the date. Anyone can open it without asking us and compare it with our copy and its fingerprint.
- It is a recognized reference. Journalists, researchers and lawyers often cite it to show what a page looked like on a given date.
- Two witnesses that match. Our timestamp and the Internet Archive copy are made separately. If anyone claimed we altered the copy, the archive.org one would disprove it.
Internet Archive and its logo are trademarks of Internet Archive. We use them only to show where the copy is; this is not an endorsement by them.
SHA-256 fingerprint of the copy
8118736a27b527fc53a781e488f7fc49ae39cce4a1697344fbefaa8a5316990d
Turing read it directly from the public link, with no human involvement.
What is it worth as evidence?
It is a technical proof of integrity and date: it shows that this exact content existed at that moment and was not modified afterwards. In Mexico, information in electronic media is recognized as evidence, and its weight depends on the reliability of the method used to create and keep it, on its remaining intact and on its being available for later consultation (Commercial Code, art. 1298-A; Federal Code of Civil Procedure, art. 210-A; National Code of Civil and Family Procedure, art. 348).
That is why each copy uses open standards that anyone can verify without trusting us: SHA-256 fingerprint, third-party RFC 3161 timestamp, OpenTimestamps on Bitcoin and the independent Internet Archive copy.
It is not a notarial certification of facts or a NOM-151 preservation certificate. If you need it for a lawsuit, the same fingerprint can be backed by them. Write to us with the folio.
Record
About the note
Data
- Outlet
- Revista Códigos
- Byline
- horacio
- Published
- November 10, 2026
- Last analyzed
- November 11, 2026
- Turing
- 2.8 (the current one)
- State
- Online
- Place of the events
- Mexico
Saved versions
- 96Version 1 · November 11, 2026 · 324 words
Every time someone analyzes the article, we read it again. If the outlet changed it, we save a new version and compare.
Are you from the outlet?
If you work at the outlet or wrote the article and think the analysis has an error, request a review: we give you a reference number and reply in writing within 10 business days.
Request a reviewKeep exploring
The analysis is automatic: it can be wrong with irony, with quotes the article criticizes or with very short texts. To protect the people in the cases, their legal name does not appear on this page. How we rate.