Congreso del Estado de Morelos
LVI Legislatura (2024–2027)
Official website (opens in another tab) Transparencia 40/100 · Baja
Congress of the Union
State congresses
Seguimos cada iniciativa, punto de acuerdo y posicionamiento sobre los derechos de las personas LGBTTTIQANB+ en la LVI Legislatura del Congreso del Estado de Morelos: quién lo presentó, a qué comisión llegó y cuánto tiempo lleva esperando un dictamen.
Records last updated: October 17, 2026
Cada instrumento con el tiempo que lleva en el Congreso. Las marcas de 60 y 120 días naturales indican cuándo una iniciativa empieza a rezagarse y cuándo la consideramos en la congeladora. How we calculate it.
Showing 3 of 3 instrumentos que coinciden con tu búsqueda.
Approved Iniciativa · presentada el 11 oct 2024
Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el que se adiciona el artículo 213 Decies al Código Penal para el Estado de Morelos y se reforman los artículos 12 y 93 de la Ley Orgánica de la…
Aprobada el 1 jul 2026
Approved Iniciativa · presentada el 18 feb 2025
Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el que se instituye la Presea “Dr. Alfonso Leija Salas”, en reconocimiento a la lucha de la defensa y promoción de los derechos de las personas…
Proceso concluido
Approved Iniciativa · presentada el 12 dic 2025
Iniciativa con proyecto de decreto por el cual se adiciona un Capítulo VII al Título Primero del Libro Segundo, parte especial, con un artículo 131 Quinquies al Código Penal para el Estado…
Aprobada el 1 jul 2026
Presenting is not the same as achieving. An approved reform changes the law; an exhortation only asks. That's why we separate each type of instrument and evaluate results, not just quantity. We tell only what follows this observatory, not all the activity of the Congress.
11 - on f-up 3 aprobados · 5 in the freezer
They propose to create or change a law, a code, or the Constitution. If approved and published, they bind all authorities. It is the instrument with the greatest scope and the most difficult to carry out: it needs a committee opinion and a vote by the Plenary.
0 - on f-up 0 aprobados
They ask an authority to do something or fix a position of Congress. They do not change any law or legally bind: their strength is political. They are usually approved more easily, sometimes on the same day.
0 being tracked
Pronouncements in the stands or in the media. They record a position, but they are not voted on or have legal effects.
Legislative work or simulation? Presenting many exhortations and positions without any legislative initiative, or presenting initiatives and leaving them in the freezer, gives visibility but does not change rights. Promoting an initiative is also the responsibility of the person who presents it: lobbying the commission, asking for it to be ruled and getting the votes. That's why we mark these signs in the assessment.
Submitting a proposal is easy; getting it approved takes work: convincing the committee, asking for it to be reviewed, and getting the votes.
This is how it is ranked: 1) more laws passed; 2) if tied, more achievement points (each proposal adds its weight by its result: a new law or approved constitutional reform is worth 3, an approved reform 2, an approved exhortation 1; those that advance add a part); 3) if they keep tying, better rating. The score (0-100) measures effectiveness - how well you did, on average.
2 of 6 bills approved
2 laws approved · 5,8 achievement points
Drives constitutional reforms or new lawsPresentar no basta: también hay que cabildear con la comisión y conseguir los votos. Aquí están quienes tienen propuestas que pasaron el plazo legal sin revisión y ninguna aprobada, y quienes presentaron propuestas que parecen simulación. Dejar congelar no es lo mismo que estar en contra: por eso van en amarillo, salvo la simulación, que se marca aparte. Quien simula apoyo no aparece entre las personas mejor evaluadas. El número 1 es quien más tiene congeladas. 1 persona en total.
1 of 2 stalled proposals
See the full methodology, with examples and academic sources
1. Not all proposals are worth the same. A reform to the Constitution or a new law weighs 3; a reform to a law or code, 2; an exhortation or point of agreement, 1, and a positioning, 0.5. It is an adaptation of the Multidimensional Transcendence Index (Bárcena, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 2019), which distinguishes high-impact proposals from symbolic ones.
2. What happened to each one matters. Approved sum 100; reviewed by the commission, 60; on time, 35; delayed, 15; rejected, 5, and frozen, 0. The rating is the average, giving each proposal the weight of its importance. Positions are not voted on, so they do not enter the rating.
3. Colors. Green: achieves results. Blue: your proposals move forward. Yellow: He submitted, but his proposals are frozen or stopped (lack of momentum, not necessarily bad faith). Red: submitted or endorsed proposals against of LGBTTTIQANB + rights. Grey: remained silent, neither presenting nor endorsing anything.
4. Allies who drive and allies who support. Submitting a proposal is worth twice as much as signing it in support. Whoever presents bills drives the agenda; whoever only signs, presents exhortations or positions themselves, accompanies it.
70 or higher: effective · 45 to 69: advances · 25 to 44: waiting · less than 25: submitted, no progress. We only count the proposals on LGBTTTIQANB+ rights that this observatory follows, not all its legislative work. We measure progress in Congress; if a law is followed later, in people's lives, it requires an impact assessment ex post like the one proposed by Transparencia Mexicana (2023).
First those who managed to get their bills passed; then, by rating. Count only the instruments the person submitted (not endorsements). “Approved” means that the Plenary voted for it by a majority or it has already been published.
| Person | Bills | Approved for them | Reports | Stalled | Exhortations | Stat. | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Espinoza López Morena | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 (0) | 0 | |
| Jazmín Juana Solano López Morena | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 | 50/100 · Avanza |
| Alberto Sánchez Ortega PT | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 |
Instruments in which the person appears as author or co-author.
Brenda Espinoza López Morena
6 instruments introduced
2 instruments introduced
Jazmín Juana Solano López Morena
2 instruments introduced
1 instrument introduced
Accessions: deputations that signed in support of an instrument presented by another person.
Sin adhesiones registradas.
Who has put their name in favor of our rights in this congress, and who against.
Drives: introduced bills in favor. Supports: presentó exhortos o posicionamientos, o se pronunció a favor en público. Firmó sin pronunciarse: firmó en apoyo, pero no presentó nada ni habló a favor en público; firmar o votar no basta para ser aliada. Not an ally: presentó o respaldó al menos una propuesta en contra, o se pronunció en contra en público. Simula apoyo: firmó o presentó a favor, pero en público se pronuncia en contra. Silence: in office, without introducing or backing any proposal on these rights.
Ordered by points: each proposal in favor adds its weight (3, 2, 1 or 0.5 depending on its scope) and is worth half if you only signed it in support.
Brenda Espinoza López Drives
Presentó 6 iniciativas de ley · 14 pts
Alberto Sánchez Ortega Drives
Presentó 2 iniciativas de ley · 4 pts
Jazmín Juana Solano López Drives
Presentó 2 iniciativas de ley · 4 pts
Sorted by severity, no solo por cantidad: cada propuesta en contra suma su peso (reforma constitucional o ley nueva 3, reforma a una ley 2, exhorto 1, posicionamiento 0.5; la mitad si solo firmó en apoyo). Por eso una reforma constitucional en contra pesa más que varios discursos.
Oscar Daniel Martínez Terrazas
1 propuesta en contra · 2 pts
1 × reforma a una ley
No presentaron ni firmaron en apoyo ninguna propuesta, ni siquiera en temas difíciles. El silencio también es una postura.
"Without party": deputations without party or parliamentary group, or without party in the official document. Independent nominations are counted separately. Tap a match to view its profile.
We only count the proposals on LGBTTTIQANB + rights that this observatory follows and the signatures of support registered in them; it does not include votes in the Plenary.
Contamos los días naturales desde que un instrumento se presenta hasta que la comisión lo dictamina. Señalamos rezago a los 60 y congeladora a los 120.
Legal basis: Reglamento para el Congreso del Estado de Morelos, art. 54, fr. I: las comisiones deben conocer, estudiar y dictaminar los asuntos turnados “en un plazo no mayor a sesenta días naturales” (iniciativas preferentes: 40 días naturales para su votación en Pleno, art. 42 de la Constitución local). El art. 61, último párrafo, permite a la comisión solicitar por escrito a la Conferencia “la ampliación o la prórroga del término”, sin fijar un máximo, por lo que no hay plazo de prórroga cuantificable. El art. 54, fr. II da 60 días hábiles para valorar iniciativas pendientes de la legislatura anterior. Última reforma del Reglamento y de la Ley Orgánica: 07/10/2026 (Marco Jurídico de Morelos). Para el semáforo se toma como referencia una prórroga de hasta 60 días naturales (el doble del plazo), porque el Reglamento no fija un máximo. See the law (opens in another tab)
Current text consulted: latest reform published on October 7, 2026.
We record each data from the Gazette and the official documents of the Congress. If you find an error, write to us. How much does each congress publish? See the transparency index.
The plenary approved it or it was already published.
The committee has already issued an opinion; the Plenary must vote or the process must be concluded.
Tiene 60 días naturales o menos desde su presentación y aún no se dictamina.
Lleva más de 120 días naturales sin dictamen: está detenida.
The process ended without approval.
Find out who makes up each commission, what initiatives they have pending and how to contact them.
